COP26: Fossil fuel industry has largest delegation at climate summit
Campaigners led by Global Witness assessed the participant list published by the UN at the start of this meeting.
They found that 503 people with links to fossil fuel
interests had been accredited for the climate summit.
These delegates are said to lobby for oil and gas
industries, and campaigners say they should be banned.
"The fossil fuel industry has spent decades denying and
delaying real action on the climate crisis, which is why this is such a huge
problem," says Murray Worthy from Global Witness.
"Their influence is one of the biggest reasons why 25
years of UN climate talks have not led to real cuts in global emissions."
About 40,000 people are attending the COP. Brazil has the
biggest official team of negotiators according to UN data, with 479 delegates.
The UK, which is hosting the talk in Glasgow, has 230
registered delegates.
So what counts as a fossil fuel lobbyist?
Global Witness, Corporate Accountability and others who have
carried out the analysis define a fossil fuel lobbyist as someone who is part
of a delegation of a trade association or is a member of a group that
represents the interests of oil and gas companies.
Overall, they identified 503 people employed by or
associated with these interests at the summit.
They also found that:
Fossil fuel lobbyists are members of two country
delegations, Canada and Russia
The fossil fuel lobby at COP is larger than the combined
total of the eight delegations from the countries worst affected by climate
change in the past 20 years
More than 100 fossil fuel companies are represented at COP,
with 30 trade associations and membership organisations also present
Fossil fuel lobbyists dwarf the UNFCCC's official indigenous
constituency by about two to one
One of the biggest groups they identified was the International Emissions Trading Association (IETA) with 103 delegates in attendance, including three people from the oil and gas company BP.
According to Global Witness, IETA is backed by many major
oil companies who promote offsetting and carbon trading as a way of allowing
them to continue extracting oil and gas.
"This is an association that has an enormous number of
fossil fuel company as its members. Its agenda is driven by fossil fuel
companies and serves the interests of fossil fuel companies," Mr Worthy
said.
"What we seeing is the putting forward of false
solutions that appear to be climate action but actually preserve the status
quo, and prevent us from taking the clear, simple actions to keep fossil fuels
in the ground that we know are the real solutions to climate crisis."
The IETA says it exists to find the most efficient
market-based means of driving down emissions. Members include fossil fuel
companies but also a range of other businesses.
"We have law firms, we have project developers, the
guys who are putting clean technology on the ground around the world, they're
also members of our association as well," says Alessandro Vitelli, an IETA
spokesman.
"We're not coming to a shuddering halt today and
tomorrow, and suddenly there's going to be no emissions from the combustion of
fossil fuels."
"There is a process to transition that's under way, and
carbon markets are the best way to make sure that transition takes place."
Campaign groups argue that the World Health Organization
didn't get serious about banning tobacco until all the lobbyists for the
industry were banned from WHO meetings. They want the same treatment for oil
and gas companies at COP.
"The likes of Shell and BP are inside these talks
despite openly admitting to upping their production of fossil gas," said
Pascoe Sabido of the Corporate Europe Observatory, who were also involved in
the analysis.
"If we're serious about raising ambition, then fossil
fuel lobbyists should be shut out of the talks."
No comments